[xmlroff] Nearly ready for xmlroff 0.5.1
Emmanuel Fleury
fleury at labri.fr
Sat Jul 7 09:58:02 UTC 2007
Emmanuel Fleury wrote:
> Tony Graham wrote:
>> I'm impressed that you ran the test suite. AFAICT, not many people do
>> that.
>
> Hum, I though it was the best way to know if it was working or not. O:-)
>
>>> Full: 128 (51.4%)
>>> Issues: 89 (35.7%)
>>> Not verified: 32 (12.9%)
>>> Total: 249
>>> 0 tests with differences
>>>
>>> No problem so far (although I don't know exactly what is expected for
>>> the tests).
>> For this release, the important part is the '0 tests with differences',
>> which shows that the rearrangement didn't introduce new bugs.
>
> Ok, it's non-regression/unit-testing checks.
>
> About the testsuite, I've been impressed by the framework developed
> here. The final report stored in index.html is quite nice to browse but
> some links are pending with nothing on the other side (especially there
> are no PDF file). Did I do something wrong (I tried to follow the
> README) ? Is there way to improve this or to know more about this test
> framework ?
My fault... I managed to run more in depth the test-framework.
1) ./configure --with-xsl-processor=../xmlroff/xmlroff/xmlroff
2) make -k
Some of the PDF are not generated others are. But, I like this framework. ;)
If you have some tips or things that I should know about testing
xmlroff, tell me. Thanks.
Regards
More information about the xmlroff-list
mailing list