[xmlroff] Nearly ready for xmlroff 0.5.1

Tony Graham Tony.Graham at MenteithConsulting.com
Mon Jul 9 14:49:14 UTC 2007


On Mon, Jul 09 2007 14:32:37 +0100, asmodai at in-nomine.org wrote:
> -On [20070709 15:18], Tony Graham (Tony.Graham at MenteithConsulting.com) wrote:
>>Apart from omitting the input XML in the first transform, it's fine.
>>
>>Can't you just run 'make xmlroff.fo' in the 'docs' directory?
>
> I just did a ./configure and make run. That is how I got that error. I don't
> get it on a subsequent run, not even after making clean.

Weird.

What about after 'make distclean'?  (Which would require ./configure
again, so would probably fail again.)

> Ah, found it. Everything in xmlroff compiles flawless with FreeBSD's make
> (pmake-derivation), yet in docs it fails.

Could it be the '$<' in:

xmlroff.fo:	xmlroff.xml ../libfo-compat.xsl
	xsltproc http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/xsl/current/fo/docbook.xsl $< > xmlroff.tmp
	xsltproc ../libfo-compat.xsl xmlroff.tmp > xmlroff.fo
	rm -f xmlroff.tmp

> When I reran this, after removing xmlroff.fo, with gmake I got the expected:

I'd expect it to work with gmake since that's what I use and I haven't
had any problems.

The way that it fails for you only on the first run is puzzling.

Regards,


Tony.


More information about the xmlroff-list mailing list