[xmlroff] libgtk2.0-dev or libgdk-pixbuf-dev or ...?

[Tony Graham]

On Sat, May 03 2008 19:17:08 +0100, fpeters at 0d.be wrote:
> Tony Graham wrote:
>> The wiki [1] says:
>> 
>>    libgtk2.0-dev (not libgdk-pixbuf-dev)
>> 
>> but 'configure.ac' says:
>> 
>>    GDKPIXBUF_PACKAGES=gdk-pixbuf-2.0
>>    GDKPIXBUF_REQUIRED_VERSION=2.2
...
>> Are there any systems in use for which that is not correct?
>
> It will be correct everywhere, as gdk-pixbuf is shipped as part of
> gtk+; modulo distribution variance in package names (probably
> libgtk2.0-devel on Fedora and cie).

Thanks for the confirmation.

Regards,


Tony.